BOOK REVIEW: THE GENTLE ART OF FORTUNE HUNTING by KJ CHARLES


I feel like my experience of reading K.J. Charles’s novels can be summed up by that TikTok sound that goes “another one, thank you. another one, thank you.” I’ve loved so many of her novels that every time I pick up a new book by her I’m like “here we go, another romance favourite in the bag.” All of this is to say, The Gentle Art of Fortune Hunting is yet another KJC novel that has joined my favourites list, and that I just loved.

As always, I loved the discussion of class, of how much money (or lack thereof) can affect your sense of security and the choices you feel you can or can’t make in your milieu. I’ve said before that I’m endlessly drawn to inter-class romances, and we get one here, so I was basically sold right from the get-go. Robin and John have such a compelling dynamic, too, one that gradually changes over the course of the novel: first combative, then a tentative detente, then slowly romantic. Their dynamic works well, I think, because their personalities complement each other so perfectly. Robin is outspoken, expressive, shameless, rarely afraid to say what he means. John, on the other hand, is more circumspect; vocal, yes, but standoffish in a way that hides how shy he really is. Together, then, these two characters make for such a fun and engaging dynamic, Robin bringing John out of his shell, John helping to ground Robin.

Every K.J. Charles novel is different, but I feel like I always love them for the same reasons: the sharp, snappy dialogue; the nuanced approach to class; the attention to historical detail; and, obviously, the romance. This was a genuinely and deeply delightful novel from start to finish, and I can’t wait for book 2 to come out this year.


Blog | Goodreads | Twitter | Instagram

BOOK REVIEW: THE MINISTRY OF TIME by KALIANE BRADLEY


The Ministry of Time is about, as its synopsis tells us, “a recently established government ministry [that] is gathering ‘expats’ from across history to establish whether time travel is feasible.” To smooth these expats’ transition to the modern world, each one of them gets paired with a government ministry employee that’s working on this project.

I lay all this out because I think this novel will work for you only if you’re able to buy into its premise–or, more specifically, its execution of this premise. Given that these “expats” are from periods of time markedly different from the 21st century–the 1600s, 1700s, 1800s, 1900s–there is a lot that their government ministry handlers have to educate them on: modern technologies like cellphones, cars, computers, etc., but also attitudes on race and gender, language that is now considered offensive, ideas around social justice more broadly. Thing is, I just couldn’t suspend my disbelief to really invest in this premise. It felt a little like the novel was trying to have its cake and eat it too: to depict the way these “expats” seriously and realistically try to adapt to their new lives in the modern world, but also to have these ha-ha moments where they sign up for Tinder, or go on Facebook, or use the internet for the first time. And it’s not that those two things can’t necessarily coexist, but more that the premise was just altogether a bit too gimmicky for me, the execution of the story not enough to counteract that persistent sense of gimmickiness that I had throughout.

It’s certainly not a bad novel, and it was engaging for the time that I read it, but overall this one didn’t quite work for me.


Blog | Goodreads | Twitter | Instagram

BOOK REVIEW: FUNNY STORY by EMILY HENRY


The new Emily Henry novel is here and I read it and it was…fine? There were some standout moments, and overall it definitely wasn’t bad, but it just didn’t have that spark for me. I liked Daphne and Miles together, their dynamic was nice (damned with faint praise), but it just didn’t feel romantic in a way that ever swept me off my feet or garnered any strong reactions from me. Actually, I feel like all my thoughts on this book might as well be summed up by: [character/relationship/dynamic/story] was [fine/okay], but it just never won me over–every somewhat positive thing I have to say about this book is always followed by a “but.”

The Emily Henry novels I’ve loved have been the angsty ones–People We Meet on Vacation and Happy Place–and Funny Story is just so sorely lacking in angst. There is simply not enough tension between Miles and Daphne. They more or less like each other from the start, *and* they’re very touchy-feely with each other also from the start, *and* they live with each other so they literally see each other and/or hang out every single day. All of this meant that I was missing the tension/angst/yearning/pining of it all, i.e. the stuff that makes a romance compelling to me. (This is basically the same problem I had with Book Lovers, except that there’s more of the romance in Funny Story than there was in Book Lovers, which felt more like contemporary fiction than romance to me.)

Some other qualms: the plot felt meandering (it sort of just plods along with little sense of purpose until the last third) and I really Did Not Care for the side characters–they felt very ~Cooky~ in a forced way that put me off, and they were a not insignificant part of the story.

Perhaps I overhyped this for myself (I definitely did) after loving Happy Place so much, but I can’t help but be disappointed. Funny Story was fine, a perfectly forgettable and lukewarm “fine.” In terms of where it sits in the Emily Henry oeuvre: my favs are still PWMOV and Happy Place–those are the only two novels of hers that I’ve truly loved. The others I feel whatever about. Funny Story ranks the highest of them (followed by Book Lovers then Beach Read), but that’s not really saying much since they’re all of a piece to me tbh.



Blog | Goodreads | Twitter | Instagram